Editor’s Note: This is another weekly article by Alex; he is still looking for a job without much luck.
A few weeks back I posted an article revealing my joy at the sight and sensation of sunshine and blue skies above. This week, I have to say, has stuttered along rather than continued in the positive momentum that has gathered recently. It’s a direct reflection of the weather, with rain pouring in spells and the nights noticeably dropping in temperature. Even the excitement of applying for a job at a Lego store couldn’t thoroughly warm me up. And ask any man in my generation, Lego is fantastic stuff.
Now I’m not going to draw too many parallels between the weather and deeper emotions, as it’s too much of a grey area, and overcast. One thing I will say, though, is that I’ve had the costly gas fire on and used an electrical heater a couple of evenings recently and who would have thought additional warmth would be sought towards the end of the month of May? Then again, this is England. Perhaps government are controlling the climate to increase spending, or maybe it’s just because rotten weather suites the British in general. One does like a jolly good moan.
However, my main issue this week to assist with clouded skies is with the regurgitating and tedious cycle of job application forms. It almost feels like Groundhog Day with some of them, as they can be so similar and even in some cases I’ve filled out the same form for the same employer in different months and still got no reply, at which point it is safe to assume I haven’t got the job. Oh, bother.
Sometimes you get automated responses, identifying they have received the application or to notify you of the position being already taken. Very rarely you get a response from an actual person (an actual human-person!) by which you get to have a brief conversation over emails, thanking them at the very least for their reply. Most of the time, however, you get nothing back at all.
From the employers perspective they will receive high numbers of applicants for different roles, and of course the reality is that your C.V or application form will be looked at for a brief 10-20 seconds and then either considered or discarded. But like anything it’s a numbers game – the more you apply for the more you’ll hear back from. I believe that would be a reasonable forecast to go by but in my experience of late the inbox remains derelict.
Having said all this, my current perception isn’t one that’s down and out. The summer is coming, in its own lackadaisical fashion, and there are jobs out there for me. My main trouble is keeping to that dreaded routine, which involves more resilience than I generally have stored within me. There’s no excuse to go wild, but after countless days looking for work the act of regressing back to a caveman doesn’t seem so radical – It would certainly make for an interesting read in the ‘Hobbies and Interests’ section of my C.V.
All in all the weather doesn’t change the incentive to get back into full time employment, but in a sense similar vibes are shared by all when the days turn for better or worse, as we all react to the heat and light. In the summer months, or weeks as it’s looking to be like, I eat less and do more. I just hope that all the times I chop and change my C.V and spend time covering bases at the job centre eventually reaps better rewards. Perhaps employers will cheer up the same as I do when the sun comes out fully; otherwise my temperament may fluctuate as the question arises “Is it me? Am I not employable?”
Of course I am employable, so unfortunately it is mostly down to the luck of the draw. I must just keep on keeping on, and so on.
Politicians on both sides of the pond have become exercised over the issue of tax avoidance this past 6 months or so, but this problem that has been around for quite some time.
Maybe it is the silver lining to the financial crash cloud because for far too long, certain businesses have been cocking a snoot at the electors and taxpayers. Business doesn’t have a (formal) vote at elections but uses all sorts of other pressure on governments.
Voters are now beginning to take notice and insisting that politicians do something about it or be defeated at the next election. Because politicians can do one thing that even the biggest business can’t unless they own the politicians – they can pass laws and (try to) make them stick.
We have Amazon trading in the EU from Luxembourg where they have ‘favourable’ arrangements, Starbucks (in the UK for 15 years and ‘failing’ to make a profit in all but one of these years) with similar arrangements in the Netherlands, Google feeling the heat because it appears that some of its London staff were ‘selling’ when that part of the operation was claimed to be carried out from Ireland and that country complaining of a Senate investigation into Apple which concluded that very favourable tax arrangements meant that Apple paid little US tax. Senator McCain estimated that Apple, with some $140bn cash reserves, had avoided some $9billion of tax to Uncle Sam last year alone. Total US offshore corporate profits were close to $2trillion last year, which if repatriated would lead to $700bn tax. Proportionately similar amounts are being lost in the UK – figures of £70 billion are claimed.
It is not only the ‘first’ world that is suffering. Similar games played by multinationals with the developing world countries are estimated to be worth some $70bn in lost revenue to those poor countries, which in many cases is far more than the aid given by first world taxpayers. So not only are companies avoiding paying tax, they are keeping countries and people in poverty. Shame on them.
These are big numbers. The truth is that none of these companies is doing anything illegal. So the answer must be to change the law but that raises a lot of problems in international negotiations.
What should be done?
The key is that to carry out this (at least) moral fraud, companies need to actually trade in the country in question. Amazon has to deliver goods from the UK, bill people from the UK, employ or contract people in the UK to do this work. They should not be able to claim that the goods delivered belong to Amazon Luxembourg and Amazon UK is just the delivery service. There are already EU rules in place for electronically delivered goods – they are deemed to be in the place where the purchase takes place – but they need better policing. In the US, the variety of sales taxes (which is not the same as VAT) makes it even more complex. We need similar rules for physical goods and a declaration that trading is being carried out.
However there is one thing that could – and should – be done and would be fairly simple to implement. Impose a Withholding Corporation Tax on larger companies that wish to trade in a country. This would be based either on the disclosed national sales volume, some sort of VAT or sales tax receipts, or an estimate by the authorities from the global past profits as declared to shareholders. It should be paid monthly or quarterly, as for example VAT is currently paid. We cannot have multinationals declaring one profit for shareholders and another for the tax man – that is lying. Profit is profit and while there are different rules applied in different countries, if a company is not profitable it will go out of business.
Against the WCT can be set the actual day-to-day money spent in the country – wages and direct costs etc. Special allowance could also be included to promote research or other activities. There will therefore be no incentive for companies to up-sticks and move to a lower tax regime if they can set all their office costs against the withholding tax. And tax paid up-front could attract a small interest rate benefit compared to tax paid in arrears – that is logical. In fact these may persuade companies to move to countries which have implemented the tax.
Now you will immediately realise that this will present companies not only with an organisational problem – although I am talking only about a small number of large (ie global) companies of course which should be able to handle such problems. In the first year they will have to pay tax in arrears on their previous year’s profits as well as the new tax ‘up front’.
This is an opportunity to introduce WCT over a period of a few years and at the same time, scale company tax back. A lot of the reason why tax avoidance is so profitable is that tax rates in some countries are quite high. The US has one of the highest company tax rates at 35% and in the EU, Bulgaria is lowest at 10%. The UK is currently 24% going down to 20% but the target should be to move to lower tax all round which will mean less of an incentive to avoid tax and enable domestic companies to grow. Only then can small companies become big companies.
But to companies which have hitherto used transfer pricing and other tricks to minimise their tax bill – even to zero – it will mean that they will have to prove to the tax man that they were not trading in the country which may be quite difficult if invoices and receipts can be produced. It is a question of possession being 9/10ths of the law.
So it really is over to the politicians. While international agreement is ideal, it is not essential. Anyone trading within a country should report and pay taxes on money genuinely earned in that country. There will still be some transfer pricing but this will need to be proved and agreed between the tax regimes of the different countries. There is no suggestion that WCT should be applied to small companies.
What do you think?
Many of you have probably guessed that even before I was interested in money I was very interested in literature; and the classics at that. Some of them are hopelessly out of fashion; about a year ago I left a comment on a blog mentioning Flaubert and it turned out [...] Continue Reading…
There was a time when the sequence of events during the first part of the year was clear: tax returns (January), top up ISAs (March), switch off central heating (April). Ok, sometimes we have had the heating on for some of the time in May. But I don’t remember having [...] Continue Reading…
Although it is sometimes difficult to believe, the needs of financial institutions and their customers can often be served by the same innovations. In the case of online credit cards, these needs—for reduced operating costs and convenience and speed, respectively—are all met by a single product type. [...] Continue Reading…
Have you read a book called ‘Wolf Brother’ by Michelle Paver? Ok, I know that it passes as a book for pre-teens but it was the one I couldn’t put down; I also eagerly awaited each next volume. On the surface, it is one of the ‘magic’ stories about a [...] Continue Reading…
I have always thought of myself as a fairly conventional and ordinary person. OK, probably not entirely ‘ordinary’ and even not entirely ‘conventional’ – there has been too much evidence to the contrary over the years – but I have never thought of myself as someone who achieves [...] Continue Reading…